so while your points are valid, your implication may suffer due to other factors I tried to give).Įric5h5: You still don't get it. This was the point of Ancient-Red-Dragon which you contradicted and my point to give the picture I had through ![]() Saying that there are some points which seem to be much smoother for Devs - which means less money: Is the case for Steam website and other services, AFAIK - and no, I would not buy anything from Steam - just And I have heard that Devs prefer to do it themselves (which Than make sure every thing works as expected. So if you can do it yourself you have less to do than if you put it in a form GOG wants it (e.g. I don't think this is too much to ask for -Īnd it will help Devs to concentrate on their main work instead of answering the same questions again and again. Should control if the things were done correctly.Īnd in this case GOG should know that there are non-Windows customers who bought sequels of that seriesĪnd should feel obliged to get info if this will come later or if there are reasons they will not reach GOG.Ī mac version exists on Steam - and as these Devs have experience how to make Mac and Linux version,Ī polite question to get an answer for their customers would be in order.Īnd this should be part of the announcement of any game. So, now you should see that is not a matter of GOG doing everything but that Devs do the main thing and So similar to some tickets getting ignored it is the same with updates.Īnd we pay GOG in first place, so GOG should take care to get updates - even trigger Devs to send them -īut it seems GOG is less interested to make their customers happy than the Devs. In THIS CASE it was GOG not pushing it to Offline Installer.Īnd no, this is not a rare case - I had several times contacted Devs who said to have pushed it to GOG, Indefinitely to get the update and blame the Dev for treating GOG customers as second class while If the Dev only puts it to GOG and does not make sure it will reach Offline Installer, than you may wait It may be one person on GOG doing it manually, but it is still GOG. The developers don't upload offline installers. this hurts.Įric5h5: Nothing you said contradicts what I said at all. I hope that sometimes this changes - but GOG is on the way to get a bad Steam. This is also normal since I am a GOG customer (2 years). manuals written by GOG).Ĭurrently they would not update the used DOSBox (which can go crazy with current GNU/Linux distros)īy the way, I got message that a GOG member will look at my support call. Yes, the former GOG customers are not pleased - and those seeing the love and care GOG hadįor their strong points are not happy either. GNU/Linux is totally neglected - and DRM free is only for SiPl mode. ![]() So summarized I am still believing that one person does the entire GOG website. Several games did not even start.ģ) I looked for changelogs - und guess what - devs put it to GOG - and - missing from offline installer.Īdditionally GOG Offline Installer does not allow Cut&Paste - so all Changelogs in the forum comesĤ) Even when developers put new versions to GOG - they may not reach the offline installer (not kidding).Īs I am no game dev, I don't know what info devs get from GOG or if you need to have a responsive From several conversation with developers this can not be further from truth.ġ) GOG needs a lot of time to get most GNU/Linux versions (updates incl.) on the Offline Installer -Īnd there is no GOG Galaxy Client for GNU/Linux (not even planned).Ģ) This time is explained by quality assurance - good joke. Eric5h5: You do know developers don't handle any of that? They just upload the new version and GOG does the Galaxy/offline installer stuff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |